In the Humanities class I am taking this semester, we are studying Postmodernism. I chose a work by Lawrence Weiner of words on a wall, A Rubber Ball Thrown on the Sea. Weiner didn't care what font or size or color was used to create this, he believed that the production of art didn't matter as much as the concept.
In a similar vein, there was a postmodern philosopher, Roland Barthes who wrote a paper entitled, The Death of the Author. Barthes’s essay summarizes itself in its final paragraph: “Thus is
revealed the total existence of writing: a text is made of multiple
writings, drawn from many cultures and entering into mutual relations of
dialogue, parody, contestation, but there is one place where this
multiplicity is focused and that place is the reader, not, as was
hitherto said, the author. The reader is the space on which all the
quotations that make up a writing are inscribed without any of them
being lost; a text’s unity lies not in its origin but in its
destination” (189).
Not a shocking conclusion for an article entitled “The Death of the
Author,” really, but truly radical idea in and of itself: that the
Author, long the focus of literary study, is not in fact all that
important – it is the reader that matters. To get to this point, Barthes
begins with the observation that “The image of literature to be found
in ordinary culture is tyrannically centered on the author… [and that
the] explanation of a work is always sought in the man or woman who
produced it, as if it were always in the end, through the more or less
transparent allegory of the fiction, the voice of a single person, the
author ‘confiding’ in us” (186).
Barthes conceives the author as chef, the text as food, and the
reader as ingesting and digesting that which the chef has prepared. In
Barthes’s opinion, only in entering the reader’s mouth does the food
take on any flavor, and only in his stomach does it release any energy.
Moreover, Barthes relentlessly reminds us that the author did not create
(in the sense of bringing into existence) any of the ingredients in his
dishes, and that the chef would cease to have any real purpose without
his patrons, that it wouldn’t really do him much good to prepare meals
that would merely sit on a table until they rotted away.
Do our lives as authors not matter? In Barthes vision of what an author should be they don't. Is skillful selection and combination of ingredients in ext to
be completely ignored? And, is not the Author almost undoubtedly also a
reader himself? What do you think? Do our lives, our backstories affect our work and make us important to the work or are we less important than the destination?
No comments:
Post a Comment